EXPERT GROUP REPORT
ON
ELECTRONIC HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES


London, 4-5 October 2008


INTRODUCTION

It is well known that the installation, more and more frequent every day at our homes, of many electronic devices whose aim, in theory, is intended for making our daily housework much easier and more bearable. They are also present in order to help us in our leisure, studies, personal tidiness, etc. They are related with the information process about what is going on in our environment, too.

Nowadays, the cultural and development rate of any society can be measured in accordance with the quantity and quality of the different appliances set in their homes.

Many activities, which we are to perform, are linked to the action of pushing or turning a certain knob.

About 30 years ago, even though the technology could be somehow complex at that time, that used generally in the building of such devices was easy to assimilate by the customer, He would just have to make a small effort to read or to listen to the explanations provided by the shopkeeper or the distributors of the devices.

Nowadays, the introduction of microelectronics and microcomputing in the manufacturing of many devices is having a boomerang effect. Even though these devices are more and more flexile, they include more functions, they are better complemented with other accessories, etc and their use is more and more complicated.

Sometimes, it is almost compulsory to have certain "technological" knowledge in order to work and benefit from all its features, what gets them somehow further from their original purposes.

If, to a non-handicapped customer in general, it is complicated or very difficult to manage and fully use some of these devices, let's think about what this could mean to an elder person or to someone with a visual impairment!

The difficulties which are generally met by the customer when using theses appliances, can be summed up in the following causes:

1. Lack of understanding on the use of the device. What purpose has it been developed with? Some may not be so intuitive at first sight.

2. The complexity of the functions to perform. There could be many of them. For instance, the different programmes and alternatives of washing in a wash-drier or in a cooking multi-robot, could make the user doubt about which one to choose.

3. The capability to rapid and simply understand the different interfaces for the use, as well as the steps to take in order to have it set or programmed. Let's have a look at the user's manual of a video player/recorder or a hi-fi system, etc.

Of course, there should be a special mention to the problems faced by a user with blindness or severe visual impairment when working these multifunction appliances.



PROBLEMS AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS IN THE USE OF DOMESTIC APPLIANCES BY VISUALLY IMPAIRED PEOPLE

Generally, people with visual impairments and with very little help from the manufacturer could manage to work a high percentage of these devices by following the guidelines listed below:

1. The colours in contrast with the key panel, information labels with colours and sizes of fonts larger than 16 dots (approximately 6 mm in height) could be enough to access to the necessary information on these labels and to clearly locate their positions and functions.

2. It is important that the indicators within the knobs or the control panel are in contrast with the base colour. This is the case of the indicators, selection areas, etc.

3. An important device to bear in mind is the type of display used. Those with an appropriate size of font and, above all, whose characters are in control with the base colour will be much preferred by this group of users. The own customer can enhance this contrast as long as the device includes systems of appropriate back lighting.

4. If the different functions of these devices are related with acoustic signals, a feedback on the actions of selection or use of the device will be obtained. This feature will make the customer feel secure about its use, avoiding possible accidents, which may result from doubts or mistakes.

5. The manuals of the devices should follow the above-stated guidelines, making special emphasis on the contrast and size of the printing character.

As we can see, these simple and basic guidelines should not seriously affect the design and, in our opinion, should not be a reason to unreasonably increase the price of a device in mass production.

These guidelines should also result, very importantly, on the support from a group of users who are not registered as visually impaired but who, in many aspects, are close to them. They are the "elders".
The increasing number of older people should often make manufacturers become more aware and we must selfishly resort to this fact, laying our claims to them.

Population is growing older. Its number is getting larger and larger and should influence manufacturers and relevant entities with their demands on the problems they have to face.

To help elder people with the use of appliances would also benefit a large number of visually impaired, as there are common parameters to solve many of their problems.



PROBLEMS AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS IN THE USE OF DOMESTIC APPLIANCES BY THE TOTALLY BLIND

Blind customers encounter many difficulties in the use of most electronic domestic appliances. It is already a long time since these appliances had their control panel physically identifiable and easily workable.

Many of these appliances had some common features, which could be classified as follows:

1. The controls and knobs had indicators that were easily identified by touch.

2. The movements of the different switches and controls were, in many cases, easily identified by their position.

3. By pushing or pulling, right or left, up or down, turning or selecting discrete positions with a clear starting and finishing gap, the user could simply choose among the various options.

4. Small acoustic signals - often issued by the actual mechanism - when performing the function (this is the case of switches or controls in the oldest TV screens), would guarantee an effective control of all functions.

The customer's memory played - in these situations - an important role, though it was not so vital as nowadays. It was rather simple to add markings or embossed labels in order to help with the process of location and memory of use.

At the present time, it is totally different. By reducing the size of the appliances thanks to the high integration enabled by means of microelectronics, the knobs and control panels have had to be adjusted to this new reality. The use of a microprocessor and, therefore, the built-in "firmware" (programming of manufacturer's circuits) has resulted in new procedures to comprehend and use the various phases to set and select appliances.

Sometimes, with only three switches, you may use a device with multiple functions. If one of the switches has a "shift" function, the combination of this switch together with other, either pushed or not, could result in multiple variations.

A blind customer starts having problems with just the location of the controls. Some of them are so small and hidden that they are almost impossible to identify by the touch.

Others are difficult to find because they are fully built on their panel. They are designed in order to be located by the sight either by means of graphisms, areas of different colours or by other visual marks. Their location would be much easier if there were complementary tactile markings to delimit their functions and layout.

Once you have found the control, you only have to push it. We shall usually have a slight "feedback", by the touch, of the action performed. This will make us doubt whether it was correctly worked or not. This is much more difficult to detect for those people with a limited sense of touch or who suffer from other diseases related to diabetes. In order to solve this situation, it is advisable to have switches with physical adjustments that are clearly marked by a movement or to-and-fro motion.

Once we have pushed a button, we shall have to wait and receive a signal related to the action performed. Sighted people can easily confirm this by the sight of any change occurred in the state of a light (i.e. on and off). In these cases, different acoustic signals - with high and low pitches - would be helpful enough to undertake this control.

In modern electronics, colours also provide additional information. If a light is on, it means that the function chosen has been activated. However, it could be "red", for instance, to warn you of a prohibition or "green" to allow you to continue. Sometimes, intermediate stages - such as a stand-by process or situation - could be associated to "intermediate" colours (such as orange). Again, acoustic signals with various pitches would play a determinant role in this control.

Not so long ago, there were as many flashing lights built-in as functions to work. Nowadays, the high integration allows having a same light (generally a diode) which flashes distinct colours.

The current trend, mainly due to cost-reduction, shows a mass use of displays of various sizes. Even "customerized" designs may be used for each device.

Under these circumstances, the acknowledgement of receipt and the state selection is shown on the screen.

The most complicated matter comes with the use of sensitive screens, i.e. those associating the control panel of the incoming data (keypads) with the outgoing information (the screen). This causes many complications to the blind customer who, keen to "explore" the device by his touch, will often turn various functions on.

There are some screens where it is almost worthless to mark the sensible areas with transparent labels, as they will change their position as they initiate new menus. To solve the accessibility to these peripherals, the most efficient technique is, by no doubt, to resort to voice synthesis or digitalized voice. The use of an interface (serial, parallel, etc) could offer very good prospects of controlling.

Sometimes, the controls are made through keyboard with different shapes that allow a better location by the touch. This refers to the keyboards built with silicone bedding. The use of this type of keyboard is advisable to blind people although it is more limited to small devices or remote controls.

It does not mean, however, that they are optimum although they are very easy to locate. The feedback of each stroke, or the state control, still remains outstanding.

We must make a special point on the standardisation of the controls and their groups. For instance, a group of the keys laid out as in the telephone keypad will make its location and understanding easier. Even if there are ink characters on the number or function, a simple technique - that is becoming very common - is to raise a single dot on the number five key in order to enable the user to have a reference.

Keys that have been laid out by means of circular sectors or crossshaped alignments will immediately suggest which ones refer to the selecting cursors. By making embossed marks, it will be possible to complement the relevant indications in order to achieve a perfect location. This is a very simple and easy technique to carry out when building a silicone pattern.

Controls such as "potentiometers" mean two very concrete problems for the blind and partially sighted end users:

1. When acting as switches or selectors, they do not include an indicator to help the user to identify which direction they are pointing at.

2. They do not have a defined starting and ending position in its scope. As a result, the user can not clearly locate it within its selection or adjustment.

A sheer change towards the right direction would enable the user to make an appropriate choice by means of "stops" easily noticeable from a well-known reference dot. This kind of system is installed on those appliances that may require some adjustments, clearly defined in advance.

The use of acoustic signals, which mark a clear difference to the various functions, should be a target to achieve.

The use and lower cost of the electronics have enabled to resort to circuits - which were very expensive in the past - with digital speech. This allows a perfect knowledge of the selection or functioning state. This technique is used - above all - in those processes where sight can not detect the different phases of the device or where the events occur at random.

One encouraging technological sign to use many of these appliances, either by a blind or visually impaired person, is the growing standardisation of the named "remote control ports", that are resorting to infra-red technology or to radio control transmission.

This technique has allowed controlling either all functions in the device, a large number of them or the basic one for its correct use.

There are some appliances where you can only programmed certain functions, only by this channel.

The control device is usually rather small, with knobs (silicone type) that are laid out in-groups of keys, very easily identified.

This technology is now being very much used in those devices within the "brown line" (radio, TV, audio, video players, satellite, etc). It seems that its use is widening to the complete range of domestic appliances.

The user's manuals of these appliances are essential in order to deeply know all functions in the device. They should be printed in braille (or, at least, a quick reference guide) and recorded in audio.

We must outline that, nowadays, there are some models of remote controllers manufactured by some companies which have implemented some features such as: voice recognition, function learning (by copying the functions from the original remote control). They could be an important alternative to help, or control, the use of these appliances.

Even though the working condition of these devices are not ideal to the blind and visually impaired, it is true that - with some training - they are rather simple to use either by themselves or with some initial help from a friend.

Nowadays, new mechanisms and technologies, such as "Bluetooth" (a short-range radio system) are introducing new paths to interconnect the various systems in a standard way.

This technology enables the radio-connection among different devices, within a short distance (not further than 10 m). One of them is becoming the "master" unit and the others will be dependent.

It is also possible to interact other groups of devices, which are already interconnected.

The communication is performed with 2.4 GHZ rate, with "hosting" technology. This provides an extraordinary quality in the communication as well as the control of any likely error during the transmission.

This system has been developped to connect small terminals, personal computers, printers, telephones, etc.

If this technology keeps developping and is finally introduced at a general level, we could be close to having a standardised communication channel, which could set the basis in order to ask and share any information amongst the various devices. One of them could be perfectly adapted to explore and analyse the data, sent or received, to the other systems. We could even consider keeping a special channel for the use of the blind and visually impaired.

We trust that, with the help of the European Commission and the EU Initiatives, all companies will become more sensitive to the accessibility problems and they will design an appropriate software aiming to review and command all functions available in a device by means of a simple port.

It is not crazy to think about this possibility as it should not mean a high cost to the manufacturer, who will not need to have any complementary circuit affecting the size, design, etc.

There are some more fancy ways to control, which are to send and to receive control messages through the connection of systems in a network. This will be built with connectors and special control buses or with the actual electrical network as an alternative to interconnect and share data.

We are about to come into the "domotic" phase. These techniques can solve a great deal of the problem and they are most needed for a group of impaired people to live independently at home. However, the cost and the dependency on this kind of installations are two major factors to consider.

Right now, we must eagerly insist on the so-called "everyone design". This concept intends to make all manufacturers aware and work on an inclusive design so that users easily identify controls and accesses to these systems with multiple impairments.

We must try to promote an informative activity and make all manufacturing companies fully aware of this. However, we should not leave behind the activities that the various organisations should place to the competent standardisation bodies, and even to the different governmental entities in order to promote appropriate laws, which will guarantee the access to information as well as the control to these devices, vital in our daily life.


CONCLUSION

As we have observed throughout the discussions of the Expert group members during the London meeting (4-5 October, 2008) that there are some solutions to design devices that are accessible as an alternative to the way they are being manufactured right now.

We just have to try and set the guidelines to some alternative designs as well as to and encourage the different manufacturing companies to apply them with full knowledge of the facts.

It is up to us, as a group of blind and partially sighted professionals, to propose the guidelines to the different Standardisation Entities so that they are incorporated within the manufacturing process.

The European Blind Union, with the European Parliament, must make a special emphasis and demand solutions so that the general public, as well as the manufacturing companies, will become fully sensitive by means of announcing appropriate laws.